Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only
- From: David Newall <davidn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 01:42:13 +1030
Greg KH wrote:
It comes down to the simple fact, if you wish to use Linux, abide by theBy the way, I'm almost certain that the COPYING file is the first, last
license it comes under. To do otherwise is both disenginous and
illegal[1].
and only document specifying licence conditions, and nothing in that
prevents a proprietary driver from including a patch that, for example,
globally replaces ALL GPL-only symbols by the less restrictive ones. In
fact, you'd be in a bit of strife down under if you tried to say
otherwise. We've got quite strong consumer protection laws down here.
You're just not allowed to claim additional licence conditions based on
source code commentary.
It's just games and hot air, isn't it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only
- From: Pekka Enberg
- Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only
- From: Christer Weinigel
- Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only
- From: Greg KH
- Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only
- Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] i2c updates for 2.6.25
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Include all lock classes in all_lock_classes
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only
- Index(es):