Re: [git pull] CPU isolation extensions
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:59:54 -0600
Andrew wrote:
(and bear in mind that Paul has a track record of being wrong
on this :))
heh - I saw that <grin>.
Max - Andrew's about right, as usual. You answered my initial
questions on this patch set adequately, but hard real time is
not my expertise, so in the final analysis, other than my saying
I don't have any more objections, my input doesn't mean much
either way.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [git pull] CPU isolation extensions
- From: Max Krasnyansky
- Re: [git pull] CPU isolation extensions
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [git pull] CPU isolation extensions
- References:
- [git pull] CPU isolation extensions
- From: Max Krasnyansky
- Re: [git pull] CPU isolation extensions
- From: Andrew Morton
- [git pull] CPU isolation extensions
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] Avoid divides in BITS_TO_LONGS
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][Regression] x86, 32-bit: trim memory not covered by wb mtrrs - FIX
- Previous by thread: Re: [git pull] CPU isolation extensions
- Next by thread: Re: [git pull] CPU isolation extensions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
