Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:02:58 +0100
Hi!
[ 23.893598] Calling initcall 0xc0c518b0: be_sleepy+0x0/0x170()
[ 23.901601] PM: no wakelarm-capable RTC
[ 23.905599] initcall 0xc0c518b0: be_sleepy+0x0/0x170() returned 0.
[ 23.910879] initcall 0xc0c518b0 ran for 3 msecs: be_sleepy+0x0/0x170()
so close, yet so far away :-)
good news: the suspend+resume self-test works perfectly now! :-)
Good. What's next here? Will you just merge it to -x86, meaning it is
planned for 2.6.26?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
- From: Pavel Machek
- Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
- From: David Brownell
- Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
- Prev by Date: Netfilter fixes to 2.6.24-git
- Next by Date: Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] suspend/resume self-test
- Next by thread: Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|