Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:31:40PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:20:08AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe
approach, although it could probably converted provided we got the
ordering right with regards to regular PCI device
initialization. Doesn't seem to be worth the effort.

After reading this, and looking at the code again, I agree. Thanks for
the great explaination, I'll leave the code alone now :)

Copy the nice explanation from the mail into the code as a comment
somewhere?

That would be nice. Muli, want to make a patch for this?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Relevant Pages