Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Fix b43 driver build for arm
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:32:29 +0100
In at least 99% of the cases this is OK and the check has found
It is a consistencycheck between host and target
layout of data.
You need to pad the structure so it becomes 8 byte in size.
Ok, I looked at the code and it is hightly questionable to me that this
check does work in a crosscompile environment (which the ARM build
most likely is).
It seems to check the size of the structure in the .o file against
the size of the structure on the _host_ where it is compiled.
I can't see why we would want to check _anything_ of the target stuff
to the host this stuff is compiled on.
I can compile an ARM kernel on any machine I want.
There actually is a comment:
* Check that sizeof(device_id type) are consistent with size of section
* in .o file. If in-consistent then userspace and kernel does not agree
* on actual size which is a bug.
So it seems what this check _wants_ to compare the sizeof the structure
in the kernel to the size of the stucture in the userland of the target system.
But it does _not_ do that.
It does compare the size of the structure in the kernel against the size of
the stucture in userland on the machine it is _compiled_ on.
That is wrong.
several bugs where things would not have worked due to different
alignmnet between kernel and userland. Just think about the
issues in a mixed 32/64 bit world.
In this particular case you _could_ be right that it would work
on ARM userland. But the only way to be sure is to pad the
structure so it become 8 byte in size.
Or as was recently done in the m68k case to tell the
compiler to specifically align it to 8 byte boundary.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Fix b43 driver build for arm
- From: Matthieu CASTET
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Fix b43 driver build for arm
- References:
- [RFC] [PATCH] Fix b43 driver build for arm
- From: Gordon Farquharson
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Fix b43 driver build for arm
- From: Michael Buesch
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Fix b43 driver build for arm
- From: Sam Ravnborg
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Fix b43 driver build for arm
- From: Michael Buesch
- [RFC] [PATCH] Fix b43 driver build for arm
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] [RFC] Smack update for file capabilities
- Next by Date: Re: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH] Implement barrier support for single device DM devices
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Fix b43 driver build for arm
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Fix b43 driver build for arm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|