Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Coding style fixes to arch/x86/mach-generic/probe.c
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:58:24 +0100
* Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
- for (i = 0; apic_probe[i]; ++i) {
- if (apic_probe[i]->mps_oem_check(mpc,oem,productid)) {
+ for (i = 0; apic_probe[i]; ++i) {
+ if (apic_probe[i]->mps_oem_check(mpc, i oem, productid)) {
you typoed that one. Please build-test files you change.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Coding style fixes to arch/x86/mach-generic/probe.c
- From: Paolo Ciarrocchi
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Coding style fixes to arch/x86/mach-generic/probe.c
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] the proposal of improve page reclaim by throttle
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 5/6] mmu_notifier: Support for drivers with revers maps (f.e. for XPmem)
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] 9p: fix oops on rmmod
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Coding style fixes to arch/x86/mach-generic/probe.c
- Index(es):