Re: New 2.6.24.2 SG_IO SCSI problems
- From: Mark Hounschell <markh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:28:42 -0500
James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 06:58 -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
Mark Hounschell wrote:Backport
Mark Hounschell wrote:I attached a backport of the patch from Tony (added as cc) that is in
Mike Christie wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:Yes, I'm using /dev/sg*. And yes again I'll checkout 2.6.25-rc2 ASIC.
Mark Hounschell wrote:If you are doing SG_IO to the sg device, then I know of one regression
I seem to have run into some sort of regression in the SG_IOAre you doing SG_IO to the sg device (/dev/sg*) or to the block device
interface of 2.6.24.2. I have an application that up until 2.6.24
worked fine. The 2.6.23.16 kernel works fine.
During reads I get these kernel messages. Writes and other functions
_seem_ OK. Actually basic
reads are working. Its with large BC reads using an io_vec list that
the problem shows up.
(/dev/sdX)?
(well not regression exactly, but I fixed a bug but the patch got
partially overwritten by another patch and that caused a new bug). Both
bugs are fixed in 2.6.25-rc2. Could you try that out if you are doing
SG_IO to the sg device.
Thanks
Mark
-
2.6.25-rc2 does fix the problem I'm having. I don't suppose there is a
patch
lying around for 2.6.24.2??
2.6.25-rc2. Could you try it out against 2.6.24.2 just to make sure it
was this patch, then we can send it to stable.
Mark Hounschell wrote:
Sorry it took so long. This does fix my problem. I hope it's not to
late for 2.6.24.3
76d78300a6eb8b7f08e47703b7e68a659ffc2053
to 2.6.24
Erm, I think you mean:
commit 4d2de3a50ce19af2008a90636436a1bf5b3b697b
Author: Tony Battersby <tonyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Feb 5 10:36:10 2008 -0500
[SCSI] fix BUG when sum(scatterlist) > bufflen
I can send it ... I thought the error was introduced post 2.6.24, but it
was actually in 2.6.24-rc1
James
I just cut and pasted from Mike's previous email. It would be great if this
could get into the 2.6.24-stable tree.
Thanks
Mark
From Tony Battersby:
When sending a SCSI command to a tape drive via the SCSI Generic (sg)
driver, if the command has a data transfer length more than
scatter_elem_sz (32 KB default) and not a multiple of 512, then I either
hit BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(direction)) in dma_unmap_sg() or else
the command never completes (depending on the LLDD).
When constructing scatterlists, the sg driver rounds up the scatterlist
element sizes to be a multiple of 512. This can result in
sum(scatterlist lengths) > bufflen. In this case, scsi_req_map_sg()
incorrectly sets bio->bi_size to sum(scatterlist lengths) rather than to
bufflen. When the command completes, req_bio_endio() detects that
bio->bi_size != 0, and so it doesn't call bio_endio(). This causes the
command to be resubmitted, resulting in BUG_ON or the command never
completing.
This patch makes scsi_req_map_sg() set bio->bi_size to bufflen rather
than to sum(scatterlist lengths), which fixes the problem.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--- linux-2.6.24.2/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2008-02-10 23:51:11.000000000
-0600
+++ linux-2.6.24.2.work/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2008-02-22
16:20:09.000000000 -0600
@@ -298,7 +298,6 @@ static int scsi_req_map_sg(struct reques
page = sg_page(sg);
off = sg->offset;
len = sg->length;
- data_len += len;
while (len > 0 && data_len > 0) {
/*
Did this ever get sent to the stable team?
Regards
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: New 2.6.24.2 SG_IO SCSI problems
- From: Mark Hounschell
- Re: New 2.6.24.2 SG_IO SCSI problems
- From: James Bottomley
- Re: New 2.6.24.2 SG_IO SCSI problems
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -v7 -rc3] Security: Introduce security= boot parameter
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 3/3] pata: "I do not think it means, what you think it means."
- Previous by thread: Re: New 2.6.24.2 SG_IO SCSI problems
- Next by thread: Re: New 2.6.24.2 SG_IO SCSI problems
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|