Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet
- From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:17:20 -0800
On Wednesday 12 March 2008 22:45, David Newall wrote:
Daniel Phillips wrote:
So you design for the number of nines you need, taking all factors
into account, and you design for the performance you need. These are
cut and dried calculations. FUD has no place here.
There's no FUD here. The problem is that you didn't say that you've
designed this for only a few nines.
Right. 6 or 7.
If you delete fsck from your
rationale, simply saying that you rely on UPS to give you time to flush
buffers, you have a much better story. Certainly, once you've flushed
buffers and degraded to write-through mode, you're obviously as reliable
as ext2/3.
Fsck was never a part of my rationale. Only reliability of components
was and is. Then people jumped in saying Linux is too unreliable to
use in a, hmm, storage system. Or transaction processing system. Or
whatever.
Balderdash, I say.
Your idea seems predicated on throwing large amounts of RAM at the
problem. What I want to know is this: Is it really 25 times faster than
ext3 with an equally huge buffer cache?
Yes.
Regards,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet
- From: david
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet
- From: David Newall
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet
- References:
- [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet
- From: Daniel Phillips
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet
- From: Daniel Phillips
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet
- From: David Newall
- [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet
- Prev by Date: Re: + revert-acpi-thermal-fixup.patch added to -mm tree
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ide-tape: remove pipeline-specific code from idetape_add_chrdev_read_request()
- Previous by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet
- Next by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading