Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance
- From: David Newall <davidn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:20:47 +1030
David Newall wrote:
Al Viro wrote:
And then we are told that linux-kernel regulars are mean and insulting...
You really are being rude and insulting. Unnecessarily so. Maybe
you're just recalcitrant (in the sense that President Suharto inferred,
not the sense that Prime Minister Keating meant.)
*blink* D'oh! Mahatir, of course.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance
- From: J.C. Pizarro
- Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance
- From: Al Viro
- Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance
- From: David Newall
- Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance
- Prev by Date: Re: document memmap option better and help people with bad memory
- Next by Date: 2.6.25 -- long standing bug with usb after resume with 4GB ram
- Previous by thread: Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance
- Next by thread: Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|