Re: [PATCH 00/10] NR_CPUS: third reduction of NR_CPUS memory usage x86-version v2
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:34:01 +0100
* Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Wii, isn't this fun...! This is a resubmission of yesterday's patches
based on the x86.git/latest tree. Yes, it _is_ a maze of twisty litle
passages. ;-)
just to make patch dependencies clear: most of the patches here can be
applied to their base trees as-is, without depending on any other patch,
correct?
the only undeclared dependency i found was the cpumask_scnprintf_len()
patch - please prominently list dependencies in the changelog like this:
[ this patch depends on "cpumask: Add cpumask_scnprintf_len function" ]
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: morrich wants you to check this out.
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.25-rc6: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/10] init: move setup of nr_cpu_ids to as early as possible v2
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/10] NR_CPUS: third reduction of NR_CPUS memory usage x86-version v2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
