linux-next: Tree for March 31
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:11:18 +1100
Hi all,
I have created today's linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git
(tar balls at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/).
You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees
file in the source. There are also quilt-import.log and merge.log files
in the Next directory. Between each merge, the tree was built with
a ppc64_defconfig for powerpc and an allmodconfig for x86_64.
There were a few merge conflicts (fairly trivial). Most new ones were
from Al Viro's NULL sparse complaint cleanups.
We are up to 50 trees, more are welcome (even if they are currently
empty). Thanks to those who have contributed, and to those who haven't,
please do.
In particular, I have very few of the architecture trees ....
Status of my local build tests is at
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next. If maintainers want to give
advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open to add
more builds.
Thanks to Jan Dittmer for adding the linux-next tree to his build tests
at http://l4x.org/k/ and the guys at http://test.kernel.org/.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgp2TtzNkng3F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- [BUILD_FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for March 31 build fails with CONFIG_SLICOSS=y
- From: Kamalesh Babulal
- [BUILD_FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for March 31 build fails on fs/novfs sys_flistxattr()
- From: Kamalesh Babulal
- [BUILD_FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for March 31 build fails with CONFIG_SLICOSS=y
- Prev by Date: Re: The never ending BEEEEP/__smp_call_function_mask with 2.6.25-rc7
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC, PATCH] fix SEM_UNDO with namespaces
- Previous by thread: Re: xen: Make hvc0 the preferred console in domU
- Next by thread: [BUILD_FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for March 31 build fails on fs/novfs sys_flistxattr()
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
