Re: [PATCH,TRIVIAL] AF_UNIX, accept() and addrlen

From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:44:40 +0100

Michael Kerrisk, le Mon 31 Mar 2008 06:00:50 +0200, a écrit :

My understanding about abstract namespace sockets (what Samuel calls
unnamed sockets)

No, unnamed sockets are not in the abstract namespace sockets. They
really have _no_ name.

Samuel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH,TRIVIAL] AF_UNIX, accept() and addrlen
  - From: Michael Kerrisk

References:
- [PATCH,TRIVIAL] AF_UNIX, accept() and addrlen
  - From: Samuel Thibault
- Re: [PATCH,TRIVIAL] AF_UNIX, accept() and addrlen
  - From: David Miller
- Re: [PATCH,TRIVIAL] AF_UNIX, accept() and addrlen
  - From: Samuel Thibault
- Re: [PATCH,TRIVIAL] AF_UNIX, accept() and addrlen
  - From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH,TRIVIAL] AF_UNIX, accept() and addrlen
  - From: Samuel Thibault
- Re: [PATCH,TRIVIAL] AF_UNIX, accept() and addrlen
  - From: Samuel Thibault
- Re: [PATCH,TRIVIAL] AF_UNIX, accept() and addrlen
  - From: Michael Kerrisk

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC,PATCH] loopback: calls netif_receive_skb() instead of netif_rx()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 10/12] xen: replace callers of alloc_vm_area()/free_vm_area() with xen_ prefixed one.
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH,TRIVIAL] AF_UNIX, accept() and addrlen
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH,TRIVIAL] AF_UNIX, accept() and addrlen
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread