Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:52:13 +0200
- mach-voyager: obsolete.
You just have to convince James @)
- mach-es7000: on the way out - latest ES7000's are generic.
That would mean dropping support for prev-gen es7000 which are not that
old actually (only a few years). But I think with a little effort the
old es7000 code could be fit into the generic architecture. It is not
that far away from a normal PC.
- mach-rdc321x: it's being de-sub-architectured. It's about one patch
away from becoming a non-subarch.
mach-numaq (not in arch, but spread out all over the port)
I hear there are only a one or two machines running left.
Unfortunately they are in test.kernel.org, but hopefully
they will die soon.
NUMAQ has quite a lot of ugly ifdefs and special cases that would be
great to eliminate
mach-bigsmp/mach-summit (also in asm only)
obsolete, should be deprecated for mach-generic
(just generic currently pulls in code from them)
A good first step would be to just disable the separate CONFIG
options and only allow using them through generic.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
- From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
- From: Jack Steiner
- Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
- From: Yinghai Lu
- Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
- From: Jack Steiner
- Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
- From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
- From: Yinghai Lu
- Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
- From: Jack Steiner
- Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
- From: Yinghai Lu
- Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Add default CPU topology information
- Next by Date: Re: The never ending BEEEEP/__smp_call_function_mask with 2.6.25-rc7
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
- Index(es):