Re: [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system
- From: Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:17:58 +0200
On Mon, 31 March 2008 17:00:03 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
I personally refuse to compare a finished FS with handles all the
crucial flash features to a non-finished FS. It just makes no sense.
Noone is forcing you.
Jörn
--
All models are wrong. Some models are useful.
-- George Box
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system
- From: Pekka Enberg
- Re: [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system
- References:
- [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system
- From: Artem Bityutskiy
- Re: [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system
- From: Jan Engelhardt
- Re: [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system
- From: Adrian Hunter
- Re: [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system
- From: Jörn Engel
- Re: [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system
- From: Artem Bityutskiy
- [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] x86: generic versions of find_first_(zero_)bit, convert i386
- Next by Date: [3/3] -reserved-ram for PCI passthrough without iommu and without paravirt
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|