Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86 TS_RESTORE_SIGMASK
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
the x86 bits look nice - but i guess this all wants to go into 2.6.26
via -mm (or linux-next), due to its cross-arch nature?
Yes, I would not suggest this change for 2.6.25 at this late date.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 1/4] set_restore_sigmask
- From: Roland McGrath
- [PATCH 2/4] set_restore_sigmask TIF_SIGPENDING
- From: Roland McGrath
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] set_restore_sigmask TIF_SIGPENDING
- From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] set_restore_sigmask TIF_SIGPENDING
- From: Roland McGrath
- [PATCH 1/2] HAVE_SET_RESTORE_SIGMASK
- From: Roland McGrath
- [PATCH 2/2] x86 TS_RESTORE_SIGMASK
- From: Roland McGrath
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86 TS_RESTORE_SIGMASK
- From: Ingo Molnar
- [PATCH 1/4] set_restore_sigmask
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.25-rc7-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86 TS_RESTORE_SIGMASK
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/4] set_restore_sigmask TIF_SIGPENDING
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|