Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: add cpuset_scnprintf function
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:28:31 -0500
Mike wrote:
But where is the API spec for /proc outputs? I'd like to see how others
have managed to change it in the past, and what are the rules for doing so.
The primary spec is the actual behaviour, unless that's clearly
busted.
Changes are usually done by adding files, lines and fields, not
changing the format of existing fields.
Perhaps you should give me a call ... I sense that the lack of
synchrony in our viewpoints is discomforting in this forum.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 0/3] x86: add cpuset_scnprintf function
- From: Mike Travis
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: add cpuset_scnprintf function
- From: Paul Jackson
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: add cpuset_scnprintf function
- From: Mike Travis
- [PATCH 0/3] x86: add cpuset_scnprintf function
- Prev by Date: Re: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/iWARP/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.26 (what's in infiniband.git)
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and hibernation callbacks (rev. 6)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: add cpuset_scnprintf function
- Next by thread: HugeTLB vs. SH3 cpu
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
