Re: 2.6.25 intended change: smc:kbd_backlight vs. smc::kbd_backlight ?
- From: Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 17:33:40 +0200
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 11:42 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 07:32 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 15:12 +0000, Justin Mattock wrote:
Hello; I noticed this as well, you loose the greatest feature; the
cool leds lights on the keyboard with the macbook pro,
A solution that worked for me was to compile pommed from the source
and edit kbd_backlight.h
regards;
Justin P. Mattock
Yeah, but it will not only affect pommed... and I don't see the
rationale of introducing :: to separate things... so I think we should
have another patch replacing the :: with ':' again to unbreak userspace
for 2.6.25.
Could someone more official please respond to this regression (CCing
Rafael to record it)
Basically the LED names were a mess, there is a documented standard
which has been there since the beginning (Documentation/leds-class.txt)
and a number of drivers didn't follow that. That standardisation commit
was an attempt to deal with this problem once and for all and in that
sense its a bugfix, not a regression. The fact function wasn't part of
the original naming scheme was a mistake (see previous discussions on
LKML) which we're trying to address without breaking the documented
standard. The side effect is that some existing drivers need to be
updated to match the documentation (and should never have been merged in
the first place because of that) :(.
So to make it clear "devicename:colour:function" means in the case of
applesmc smc::kbd_backlight because there is no colour defined. One
could have used "devicename:function:colour" without breaking things -
no ?
So it seems we will have to file bug reports to the led dealing
userspace programs ...
Soeren
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.25 intended change: smc:kbd_backlight vs. smc::kbd_backlight ?
- From: Richard Purdie
- Re: 2.6.25 intended change: smc:kbd_backlight vs. smc::kbd_backlight ?
- References:
- 2.6.25 intended change: smc:kbd_backlight vs. smc::kbd_backlight ?
- From: Soeren Sonnenburg
- Re: 2.6.25 intended change: smc:kbd_backlight vs. smc::kbd_backlight ?
- From: Soeren Sonnenburg
- Re: 2.6.25 intended change: smc:kbd_backlight vs. smc::kbd_backlight ?
- From: Justin Mattock
- Re: 2.6.25 intended change: smc:kbd_backlight vs. smc::kbd_backlight ?
- From: Soeren Sonnenburg
- Re: 2.6.25 intended change: smc:kbd_backlight vs. smc::kbd_backlight ?
- From: Richard Purdie
- 2.6.25 intended change: smc:kbd_backlight vs. smc::kbd_backlight ?
- Prev by Date: Realtek 8111c weirdness problems, apic/msi, and normal bug
- Next by Date: Re: pci: add to global list before sysfs?
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.25 intended change: smc:kbd_backlight vs. smc::kbd_backlight ?
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.25 intended change: smc:kbd_backlight vs. smc::kbd_backlight ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|