Re: [RFC][PATCH][NET] Fix never pruned tcp out-of-order queue
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:14:56 +0200
The main difference seems to be that
sk_rmem_schedule/__sk_mem_schedule is called more often, but it is
unclear how this affects the ooo pruning which only checks
the queue length anyways.
tcp_data_queue() would not do the tcp_prune_ofo_queue() in some
cases, it's the whole point of the patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH][NET] Fix never pruned tcp out-of-order queue
- From: Vitaliy Gusev
- Re: [RFC][PATCH][NET] Fix never pruned tcp out-of-order queue
- References:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH][NET] Fix never pruned tcp out-of-order queue
- From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [RFC][PATCH][NET] Fix never pruned tcp out-of-order queue
- From: David Miller
- Re: [RFC][PATCH][NET] Fix never pruned tcp out-of-order queue
- From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [RFC][PATCH][NET] Fix never pruned tcp out-of-order queue
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: restore mask_bits in msi shutdown
- Next by Date: Re: regression caused by: genirq: do not leave interupts enabled on free_irq
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH][NET] Fix never pruned tcp out-of-order queue
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH][NET] Fix never pruned tcp out-of-order queue
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
