Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:12:25 +0200
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 03:58:56PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:34:14PM +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote:If you google you will find a long thread about this patch.
Hello.
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
It looks like the change was introduced by commitIndeed. But the log message
67926892ef7a7fbc76de607120d44416019fdf07
http://www.mail-archive.com/git-commits-head@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg36026.html
doesn't seem to specify the reason
for the change, so this doesn't
clarify a thing, unfortunately.
I think that we should register devices even if there is no driver inSince there seem to be no objections,
the kernel for it because driver may be compiled at later time or be out
of tree. Adding patch author and other people that signed off the patch
to CC...
would you mind adding the patch to your
git tree? Or who should that be?
I try to stay within drivers/input boundaries ;) Ingo I think is the
person you need.
It is all about saving memory for embedded platforms.
No need to have the driver if there is no speaker on the board.
Ask Michael (author) if you need more info.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
- From: Stas Sergeev
- Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
- From: Dmitry Torokhov
- Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
- References:
- [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
- From: Stas Sergeev
- Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
- From: Dmitry Torokhov
- Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
- From: Stas Sergeev
- Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
- From: Dmitry Torokhov
- Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
- From: Stas Sergeev
- Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
- From: Dmitry Torokhov
- [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] video: fix SOC_CAMERA_MT9M001 build bug
- Next by Date: Re: pci_proc_init: proc_dir_entry '00' already registered
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|