Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 11:04:29 +0200
* Frans Pop <elendil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Friday 02 May 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote:
This is just a transient issue during VT switch or server exit though,
right? X functionality isn't affected, and your VTs work fine?
Transient only. I've just tested again and this time the band was
visible on top of the text on VT1 for about 2 seconds. Then it
disappeared. The artifacts also appear when I log out from KDE (i.e.
without exiting the server), and I also get the messages when logging
out and logging in again.
I do not see any performance issues, but I've only used this kernel
for a very short time.
If so, it might not be a PAT issue but just a different memory
layout or something (and therefore it would really just be a
cosmetic bug in the X driver).
The artifacts may not be a PAT issue directly, but it is a clear
regression for me as I currently have a nice clean screen when X shuts
down. I'm also 100% sure that it is caused by enabling PAT. A kernel
with same config and only PAT disabled does not show the artifacts.
ok, Cc:-ed more folks - this bug has to be resolved regardless of the
default selection.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
- From: Frans Pop
- RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
- From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh
- Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
- From: Jesse Barnes
- Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
- From: Frans Pop
- [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
- Prev by Date: Re: [2.6.25-git18 => 2.6.26-rc1-git1] Xorg crash with xf86MapVidMem error
- Next by Date: Re: kconfig - a suggestion how to fix the select issue
- Previous by thread: Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
- Next by thread: Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|