Re: [PATCH -mm] kexec jump -v9
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 14:18:36 +0200
On Thu 2008-05-15 15:03:17, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> writes:
Well, it looks like we do similar things concurrently. Please have a look
here: http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Separating_Suspend_and_Hibernation
Yes. Part of the reason I wanted to separate these two conversations
I knew something was going on.
Similar patches are in the Greg's tree already.
Taking a look.
I just can't get past the fact in that the only reason hibernation can
not use the widely implemented and tested probe/remove is because of
filesystems on block devices, and that you are proposing to add 4
methods for each and every driver to handle that case, when they
don't need ANYTHING!
I wonder how hard teaching the upper layers to deal with
hotplug/remove is?
It looked _too_ hard when I was looking... at least if we are thinking
off "keep the filesystem mounted over unplug-replug".
Or do you have something else in mind?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH -mm] kexec jump -v9
- From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH -mm] kexec jump -v9
- From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- Re: [PATCH -mm] kexec jump -v9
- From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH -mm] kexec jump -v9
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Guarantee that COW faults for a process that called mmap(MAP_PRIVATE) on hugetlbfs will succeed
- Next by Date: PCI: Failed to allocate mem resource for ENE CB1410
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm] kexec jump -v9
- Next by thread: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH -mm] kexec jump -v9
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|