Re: Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++)
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 08:06:24 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Holger Kiehl wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Hardware:Why is the Sequential Output (Block) for raid6 165719 and for raid5 only
Results:
http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/raid/20080528/raid-levels.html
http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/raid/20080528/raid-levels.txt
86797? I would have thought that raid6 was always a bit slower in writting
due to having to write double amount of parity data.
Holger
I will re-run the RAID5 test and also run the test on a single disk and update the results later.
Justin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++)
- From: Justin Piszcz
- Re: Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++)
- From: Holger Kiehl
- Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++)
- Prev by Date: Re: [spi-devel-general] Accelerometer, Gyros and ADC's etc within the kernel.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/10] x86: convert to generic helpers for IPI function calls
- Previous by thread: Re: Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++)
- Next by thread: Re: Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++)
- Index(es):