Re: [PATCH 1/7] mmc: at91_mci: support for block size not modulo 4
- From: Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 14:57:33 +0200
Hi Nicolas!
On Friday 30 May 2008, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
From: Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@xxxxxxx>
Implement transfer with size not modulo 4 for at91sam9*. Please note that the
at91rm9200 simply can't handle this.
Signed-off-by: Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
---
I just want we don't forget that at91sam9260 errata, pointed by someone when I
posted this patch...
44.2.4.4 Data Write Operation and number of bytes
The Data Write operation with a number of bytes less than 12 is impossible.
Problem Fix/Workaround
The PDC counters must always be equal to 12 bytes for data transfers lower than 12 bytes. The
BLKLEN or BCNT field are used to specify the real count number.
We should probably fix that thing in the next release and verify if other
chips are affected!
drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c | 15 ++++++++++-----here, we should do something like
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c
index 8979ad3..543b64b 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c
@@ -233,11 +233,11 @@ static void at91_mci_pre_dma_read(struct at91mci_host *host)
if (i == 0) {
at91_mci_write(host, ATMEL_PDC_RPR, sg->dma_address);
- at91_mci_write(host, ATMEL_PDC_RCR, sg->length / 4);
+ at91_mci_write(host, ATMEL_PDC_RCR, (data->blksz & 0x3) ? sg->length : sg->length / 4);
}
else {
at91_mci_write(host, ATMEL_PDC_RNPR, sg->dma_address);
- at91_mci_write(host, ATMEL_PDC_RNCR, sg->length / 4);
+ at91_mci_write(host, ATMEL_PDC_RNCR, (data->blksz & 0x3) ? sg->length : sg->length / 4);
}
}
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static void at91_mci_send_command(struct at91mci_host *host, struct mmc_command
if (data) {
- if ( data->blksz & 0x3 ) {
+ if ( cpu_is_at91rm9200() && (data->blksz & 0x3) ) {
pr_debug("Unsupported block size\n");
cmd->error = -EINVAL;
mmc_request_done(host->mmc, host->request);
@@ -482,7 +482,10 @@ static void at91_mci_send_command(struct at91mci_host *host, struct mmc_command
} else {
/* zero block length and PDC mode */
mr = at91_mci_read(host, AT91_MCI_MR) & 0x7fff;
- at91_mci_write(host, AT91_MCI_MR, mr | (block_length << 16) | AT91_MCI_PDCMODE);
{
/* blocks smaller than 16 will be rounded up to 16 at91sam9260, and 16 is modulo 4 :) */
if (!(cpu_is_at91sam9260() && size < 16))
mr |= (data->blksz & 0x3) ? AT91_MCI_PDCFBYTE : 0;
}
+ mr |= (block_length << 16);here, we should add something like
+ mr |= AT91_MCI_PDCMODE;
+ at91_mci_write(host, AT91_MCI_MR, mr);
/*
* Disable the PDC controller
@@ -517,7 +520,9 @@ static void at91_mci_send_command(struct at91mci_host *host, struct mmc_command
pr_debug("Transmitting %d bytes\n", host->total_length);
at91_mci_write(host, ATMEL_PDC_TPR, host->physical_address);
- at91_mci_write(host, ATMEL_PDC_TCR, host->total_length / 4);
+ at91_mci_write(host, ATMEL_PDC_TCR, (data->blksz & 0x3) ?
+ host->total_length : host->total_length / 4);
{
unsigned long size = data->blksz;
if (cpu_is_at91sam9260() && size < 16 )
size = 16;
at91_mci_write(host, ATMEL_PDC_TCR, (size & 0x3) ? size : size / 4);
}
+
ier = AT91_MCI_CMDRDY;
}
}
Best regards
Marc
N?§²æìr¸?yúè?Øb²X¬¶Ç§vØ^?)Þº{.nÇ+?·¥?{±?êçzX§¶?¡Ü¨}©?²Æ zÚ&j:+v?¨¾«?êçzZ+?Ê+zf£¢·h??§~??Ûiÿûàz¹®w¥¢¸??¨èÚ&¢)ߢf?ù^jÇ«y§m?á@A«a¶Úÿ0¶ìh®å?i
- References:
- [PATCH 0/7] mmc: at91_mci: rework to allow better transfer
- From: Nicolas Ferre
- [PATCH 0/7] mmc: at91_mci: rework to allow better transfer
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.26-rc4: RIP __call_for_each_cic+0x20/0x50
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 00/15] security: pass path instead of inode to security ops
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 4/7] mmc: at91_mci: add multiwrite switch
- Next by thread: Question about smp_read_barrier_depends() in kernel/marker.c
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading