Re: [RFC 0/7] [RFC] cramfs: fake write support
- From: David Newall <davidn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:26:05 +0930
arnd@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Many existing systems currently use unionfs or aufs for this
purpose, by overlaying a tmpfs over a read-only file
system like cramfs, squashfs or iso9660. IMHO, it would
be a much nicer solution to not require unionfs for a simple
case like this, but rather have support for it in the file
system. If people find this useful, we can do the same in
other read-only file system.
I don't agree that it is nicer to do this in cramfs. I prefer the
technique of union of a tmpfs over some other fs because a single
solution that works with all filesystems is better than re-implementing
the same idea in multiple filesystems. Multiple implementations is a
recipe for bugs and feature mismatch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC 0/7] [RFC] cramfs: fake write support
- From: Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [RFC 0/7] [RFC] cramfs: fake write support
- References:
- [RFC 0/7] [RFC] cramfs: fake write support
- From: arnd
- [RFC 0/7] [RFC] cramfs: fake write support
- Prev by Date: [Bug #10761] hackbench regression with 2.6.26-rc2 on tulsa machine
- Next by Date: Re: [Bug #10825] appletouch after wakeup
- Previous by thread: [RFC 0/7] [RFC] cramfs: fake write support
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC 0/7] [RFC] cramfs: fake write support
- Index(es):