Re: Prevent busy looping
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:43:29 +0900
Elias Oltmanns wrote:
Since I'm a little confused by your comment, please explain again. Do
you mean to say that busy looping doesn't lock up the machine in general
or merely in the case of a simplex configuration?
It busy loops but it won't lock up as command completion is the loop
breaker and command completion comes via IRQ and the busy looping
doesn't happen solely in the IRQ context. Still needs to be fixed tho.
Anyways, this is only limited to ->qc_defer for simplex and the reason
why there's busy loop is because we're trying to schedule two
independent hosts and SCSI midlayer (of course) doesn't have the notion
of cross host deferring.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Prevent busy looping
- From: James Bottomley
- Re: Prevent busy looping
- References:
- Re: Prevent busy looping
- From: Tejun Heo
- Re: Prevent busy looping
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: Prevent busy looping
- From: Tejun Heo
- Re: Prevent busy looping
- From: Tejun Heo
- Re: Prevent busy looping
- From: Elias Oltmanns
- Re: Prevent busy looping
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/8] Alchemy: register mmc platform device for db1200/pb1200 boards.
- Next by Date: [PATCH 0/3][BUGFIX] configfs: Fix deadlock rmdir() vs rename()
- Previous by thread: Re: Prevent busy looping
- Next by thread: Re: Prevent busy looping
- Index(es):