Re: [PATCH 008 of 29] md: Close race in md_probe
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:38:06 +1000
On Friday June 27, maan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 16:50, NeilBrown wrote:...
There is a possible race in md_probe. If two threads call md_probe
for the same device, then one could exit (having checked that
->gendisk exists) before the other has called kobject_init_and_add,
thus returning an incomplete kobj which will cause problems when
we try to add children to it.
Even with this patch, md_probe() calls mddev_find() without holding
the disks_mutex. Is this OK? If it isn't, something like the patch
below might be necessary.
Thanks for looking at this and asking.
No, the below patch is not necessary.
mddev_find gets a reference on the mddev, so it cannot become stale.
md_probe does not return what it gets from mddev_find until getting
the disks_mutex lock and checking the contents, so it is sure to
return a good mddev.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
--
Andre
---
From: Andre Noll <maan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fix possible race in md_probe().
The current code calls mddev_find() without any locks held. It might
happen that mddev_find() succeeds but the returned mddev pointer
becomes stale just before the disks_mutex is aquired.
So close the race by calling mddev_find() with the disks mutex held.
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 647395b..6cb8773 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -3184,17 +3184,20 @@ static int mdp_major;
static struct kobject *md_probe(dev_t dev, int *part, void *data)
{
static DEFINE_MUTEX(disks_mutex);
- mddev_t *mddev = mddev_find(dev);
+ mddev_t *mddev;
struct gendisk *disk;
int partitioned = (MAJOR(dev) != MD_MAJOR);
int shift = partitioned ? MdpMinorShift : 0;
int unit = MINOR(dev) >> shift;
int error;
- if (!mddev)
- return NULL;
mutex_lock(&disks_mutex);
+ mddev = mddev_find(dev);
+ if (!mddev) {
+ mutex_unlock(&disks_mutex);
+ return NULL;
+ }
if (mddev->gendisk) {
mutex_unlock(&disks_mutex);
mddev_put(mddev);
--
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 008 of 29] md: Close race in md_probe
- From: Andre Noll
- Re: [PATCH 008 of 29] md: Close race in md_probe
- References:
- [PATCH 000 of 29] md: Introduction : patchbomb for 2.6.27 merge window
- From: NeilBrown
- [PATCH 008 of 29] md: Close race in md_probe
- From: NeilBrown
- Re: [PATCH 008 of 29] md: Close race in md_probe
- From: Andre Noll
- [PATCH 000 of 29] md: Introduction : patchbomb for 2.6.27 merge window
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 001/001] linux-input: Support for BCM5974 multitouch trackpad
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Add missing unlock to an error path in ext4_quota_write()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 008 of 29] md: Close race in md_probe
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 008 of 29] md: Close race in md_probe
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|