Re: [PATCH] stopmachine: add stopmachine_timeout

Heiko Carstens wrote:
Hmm.. probably a stupid question: but what could happen that a real cpu
(not virtual) becomes unresponsive so that it won't schedule a MAX_RT_PRIO-1
prioritized task for 5 seconds?

The original problem (once I heard and easily reproduced) was there was an
another MAX_RT_PRIO-1 task and the task was spinning in itself by a bug.
(Now this would not be a problem since RLIMIT_RTTIME will work for it, but
I cannot deny that there are some situations which cannot set the limit.)

However there would be more possible problem in the world, ex. assume that
a routine work with interrupt (and also preemption) disabled have an issue
of scalability so it takes long time on huge machine then stop_machine will
stop whole system such long time. You can assume a driver's bug. Now the
stop_machine is good tool to escalate a partial problem to global suddenly.

So I think monotonic wallclock time actually makes the most sense here.

This is asking for trouble... a config option to disable this would be
nice. But as I don't know which problem this patch originally addresses
it might be that this is needed anyway. So lets see why we need it first.

I'm not good at VM etc., but I think user doesn't care who holds a cpu,
whether other guest or actual buggy software or space alien or so.
The important thing here is return control to user if timeout.

Thanks,
H.Seto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Relevant Pages

  • Re: wrong final bzImage build (regading #14270)
    ... The original problem was titled "Cannot boot on ... fails to boot on a PIII Celeron machine. ... The bug is very difficult to find. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Wish I was using .net
    ... original problem I stated would have got through because like a lot of ... The point is with dot net there ... would be a zero chance of that bug getting through. ... Michael ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: grub lost, please help
    ... > and the original problem here: ... Is the bug filed in Launchpad? ... as Launchpad clean up rate on my previous crash bug filling ... This is actually quite a wide problem (the lack of QA staff), ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: Problem with number lock
    ... That might be your original problem. ... > BUG: Multiple SendKeys Statement Turns Off NumLock Key ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.programming)