Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:10:09 +0200
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
So if the version were to be date-based, instead of releasing 2.6.26,
maybe we could have 2008.7 instead. Or just increment the major version
every decade, the middle version every year, and the minor version every
time we make a release. Whatever.
Or you could just do it like emacs or Solaris and simply use a single number.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?
- From: Lennart Sorensen
- Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?
- From: Parag Warudkar
- Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?
- From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?
- From: Jan Engelhardt
- Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?
- References:
- From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?
- From: Stoyan Gaydarov
- Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?
- From: Linus Torvalds
- From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?
- Prev by Date: Re: ACPI Error under 2.6.26-rc*
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86: make memtest support 32bit
- Previous by thread: Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?
- Next by thread: Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?
- Index(es):