Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- experimental revert for 2.6.27 failed
- From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:05:05 -0700
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:03 AM, David Witbrodt <dawitbro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
please try attached patch with 2.6.27-rc3
Thx for the patch... and for providing it as an attachment. My email
situation is less than optimal, and I am stuck using my ISP's web
interface for the present.
I used 'git apply --check <patchfilename>' first, and got no errors, so
I applied it, built, installed, and rebooted.
could apply with
cat revert_*.;patch | patch -p1
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- experimental revert for 2.6.27 failed
- From: David Witbrodt
- Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- experimental revert for 2.6.27 failed
- Prev by Date: Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- experimental revert for 2.6.27 failed
- Next by Date: Re: pthread_create() slow for many threads; also time to revisit 64b context switch optimization?
- Previous by thread: Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- experimental revert for 2.6.27 failed
- Next by thread: Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- experimental revert for 2.6.27 failed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
