Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression
- From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:04:24 +0300 (EEST)
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, David Witbrodt wrote:
Please advise me on how you would like me to handle 2.6.27 kernels.
If I use your patch on 2.6.27-rc3, the message scroll off the 80x25
screen before I can see them...
Couldn't you play with CONFIG_BOOT_PRINTK_DELAY?
--
i.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Prev by Date: Bug: "bad unlock balance detected" 2.6.27-rc3-next-20080820
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Section mismatch contig_page_data and bootmem_node_data
- Previous by thread: Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression
- Next by thread: Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression
- Index(es):
