[PATCH 4/4] acpi: semaphore removal
- From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:59:49 -0700
The semaphore usage in ACPI is more like completions. The ASL
functions getting implemented here are signals which follow a
"wait for", signaled, or reset format.
This implements the ACPI signaling methods with the Linux
completion API, instead of using semaphores.
Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/osl.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
index e6f7337..63de45e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
#include <linux/ioport.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/jiffies.h>
-#include <linux/semaphore.h>
+#include <linux/completion.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
@@ -768,42 +768,44 @@ void acpi_os_delete_lock(acpi_spinlock handle)
acpi_status
acpi_os_create_semaphore(u32 max_units, u32 initial_units, acpi_handle * handle)
{
- struct semaphore *sem = NULL;
+ struct completion *comp = NULL;
- sem = acpi_os_allocate(sizeof(struct semaphore));
- if (!sem)
+ BUG_ON(initial_units);
+
+ comp = acpi_os_allocate(sizeof(struct completion));
+ if (!comp)
return AE_NO_MEMORY;
- memset(sem, 0, sizeof(struct semaphore));
+ memset(comp, 0, sizeof(struct completion));
- sema_init(sem, initial_units);
+ init_completion(comp);
- *handle = (acpi_handle *) sem;
+ *handle = (acpi_handle *) comp;
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_MUTEX, "Creating semaphore[%p|%d].\n",
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_MUTEX, "Creating completion[%p|%d].\n",
*handle, initial_units));
return AE_OK;
}
/*
- * TODO: A better way to delete semaphores? Linux doesn't have a
- * 'delete_semaphore()' function -- may result in an invalid
+ * TODO: A better way to delete completions? Linux doesn't have a
+ * 'delete_completions()' function -- may result in an invalid
* pointer dereference for non-synchronized consumers. Should
* we at least check for blocked threads and signal/cancel them?
*/
acpi_status acpi_os_delete_semaphore(acpi_handle handle)
{
- struct semaphore *sem = (struct semaphore *)handle;
+ struct completion *comp = (struct completion *)handle;
- if (!sem)
+ if (!comp)
return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_MUTEX, "Deleting semaphore[%p].\n", handle));
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_MUTEX, "Deleting completion[%p].\n", handle));
- BUG_ON(!list_empty(&sem->wait_list));
- kfree(sem);
- sem = NULL;
+ BUG_ON(!completion_done(comp));
+ kfree(comp);
+ comp = NULL;
return AE_OK;
}
@@ -814,17 +816,17 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_delete_semaphore(acpi_handle handle)
acpi_status acpi_os_wait_semaphore(acpi_handle handle, u32 units, u16 timeout)
{
acpi_status status = AE_OK;
- struct semaphore *sem = (struct semaphore *)handle;
+ struct completion *comp = (struct completion *)handle;
long jiffies;
int ret = 0;
- if (!sem || (units < 1))
+ if (!comp || (units < 1))
return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
if (units > 1)
return AE_SUPPORT;
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_MUTEX, "Waiting for semaphore[%p|%d|%d]\n",
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_MUTEX, "Waiting for completion[%p|%d|%d]\n",
handle, units, timeout));
if (timeout == ACPI_WAIT_FOREVER)
@@ -832,18 +834,18 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_wait_semaphore(acpi_handle handle, u32 units, u16 timeout)
else
jiffies = msecs_to_jiffies(timeout);
- ret = down_timeout(sem, jiffies);
+ ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(comp, jiffies);
if (ret)
status = AE_TIME;
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_MUTEX,
- "Failed to acquire semaphore[%p|%d|%d], %s",
+ "Failed to acquire completion[%p|%d|%d], %s",
handle, units, timeout,
acpi_format_exception(status)));
} else {
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_MUTEX,
- "Acquired semaphore[%p|%d|%d]", handle,
+ "Acquired completion[%p|%d|%d]", handle,
units, timeout));
}
@@ -855,18 +857,18 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_wait_semaphore(acpi_handle handle, u32 units, u16 timeout)
*/
acpi_status acpi_os_signal_semaphore(acpi_handle handle, u32 units)
{
- struct semaphore *sem = (struct semaphore *)handle;
+ struct completion *comp = (struct completion *)handle;
- if (!sem || (units < 1))
+ if (!comp || (units < 1))
return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
if (units > 1)
return AE_SUPPORT;
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_MUTEX, "Signaling semaphore[%p|%d]\n", handle,
- units));
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_MUTEX, "Signaling completion[%p|%d]\n",
+ handle, units));
- up(sem);
+ complete(comp);
return AE_OK;
}
--
1.5.5.1.32.gba7d2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] acpi: semaphore removal
- From: Matthew Wilcox
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] acpi: semaphore removal
- References:
- [PATCH 1/4] mutex: add mutex_lock_timeout()
- From: Daniel Walker
- [PATCH 2/4] acpi: add real mutex function calls
- From: Daniel Walker
- [PATCH 3/4] acpi: add lockdep magic
- From: Daniel Walker
- [PATCH 1/4] mutex: add mutex_lock_timeout()
- Prev by Date: USB Serial device disconnect causes IRQ disable after using ehci controller halted
- Next by Date: Re: [Bug #11342] Linux 2.6.27-rc3: kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c - bisected
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 3/4] acpi: add lockdep magic
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/4] acpi: semaphore removal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
