Re: [PATCH] USB: add USB test and measurement class driver - round 2
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:01:33 -0700
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 06:41:15PM +0200, Marcel Janssen wrote:
On Friday 29 August 2008 16:39:02 Greg KH wrote:
The issue with using cat on the shell level is that it uses fread
which has the (in this case) ugly behaviour of recalling the driver's
read method until the full number of characters requested has been
accumulated (or until zero characters are returned, indicating the end
of file). With USBTMC instruments, this behavour is bad because the
retry will not just return zero characters, it will cause a timeout
with the associated error condition in the device. So, to enable the
use of echo/cat, I added some fread handling to the driver (which
catches the retries). I believe this also has been removed, so I
assume cat/fread will not work (?).
I do not know, but we do not do wierd things in the kernel just because
of broken userspace programs. This logic should be done in userspace,
and programs should look at the return value of read() and handle it
properly. Otherwise it is a bug.
I don't think this is broken in user space. The problem is that when you issue
a measurement command it is not known how many bytes it will return. This is
probably due to ASCII output being very common in T&M devices instead of raw
data (int, float etc). The ASCII formatting is done in the device and this
returns just a string which may or may not be terminated by the term char.
This is of course not true for all T&M devices, but the majority works this
way.
I admit that the above produces a lot of overhead, but it's just a fact that
T&M devices work this way, including ours for most of their data processing
(not all though).
How is this overhead in userspace, just do something like the following:
char big_buffer[16000]; /* bigger than any possible request */
size = read(file_desc, &big_buffer[0], sizeof(big_buffer));
and size is the amount of data you actually read from the device, i.e.
one request.
I think the USBTMC spec is quite clear on how it should be implemented on
messaging level. Basically when you issue the command "*IDN?" the device
will process this and return the device ID string. The length of this string
is set in the TransferSize of the 12 byte header that the device returns. The
problem when you issue a read command is that the read command does not yet
know how much data to expect. It should issue the REQUEST_DEV_DEP_MSG_IN
first and set the TransferSize value high enough.
In the USBTMC_488 extension you find an example (chapter 3.3.1 page 7) that
shows the REQUEST_DEV_DEP_MSG_IN TransferSize being set to 64 although the
actual data being returned from the device is less (only 36 bytes).
What you do see in practice is that when someone would issue a read command
and asking for less bytes than are available is that the user program may
handle this as a warning telling the user that he did not request all
available data.
Then that's a userspace bug, don't do that in your program that reads
from these types of devices :)
Stefan's driver works exactly the way I would expect from a users point of
view. Whether the implementation can be improved is another issue, but the
behaviour is correct and compliant with other usbtmc drivers on other
platforms.
But it's not compliant with the "standard" way of using a file
descriptor in unix, and might break some POSIX requirements as well (I'm
not a good POSIX follower, so I don't know for sure...)
As this is trivial to handle in userspace, and requires no additional
wierd code in the kernel driver, I don't see this as something we should
change the driver for.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] USB: add USB test and measurement class driver - round 2
- From: Greg KH
- RE: [PATCH] USB: add USB test and measurement class driver - round 2
- From: stefan_kopp
- Re: [PATCH] USB: add USB test and measurement class driver - round 2
- From: Greg KH
- Re: [PATCH] USB: add USB test and measurement class driver - round 2
- From: Marcel Janssen
- Re: [PATCH] USB: add USB test and measurement class driver - round 2
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.27-rc5: System boot regression caused by commit a2bd7274b47124d2fc4dfdb8c0591f545ba749dd
- Next by Date: RE: refcount leak in pci_get_device()?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] USB: add USB test and measurement class driver - round 2
- Next by thread: [PATCH] message queues: increase range limits
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|