[PATCH] sunrpc - fixup userspace buffer possible overrun v3
- From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:25:49 +0400
Vegard Nossum reported
----------------------
I noticed that something weird is going on with /proc/sys/sunrpc/transports.
This file is generated in net/sunrpc/sysctl.c, function proc_do_xprt(). When
I "cat" this file, I get the expected output:
$ cat /proc/sys/sunrpc/transports
tcp 1048576
udp 32768
But I think that it does not check the length of the buffer supplied by
userspace to read(). With my original program, I found that the stack was
being overwritten by the characters above, even when the length given to
read() was just 1.
David Wagner added (among other things) that copy_to_user could be
probably used here.
Ingo Oeser suggested to use simple_read_from_buffer() here.
The conclusion is that proc_do_xprt doesn't check for userside buffer
size indeed so fix this by using Ingo's suggestion.
Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Index: linux-2.6.git/net/sunrpc/sysctl.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.git.orig/net/sunrpc/sysctl.c 2008-08-31 18:58:50.000000000 +0400
+++ linux-2.6.git/net/sunrpc/sysctl.c 2008-08-31 19:15:57.000000000 +0400
@@ -60,23 +60,27 @@ static int proc_do_xprt(ctl_table *table
void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
{
char tmpbuf[256];
- int len;
+ size_t len;
+ ssize_t ret;
+
if ((*ppos && !write) || !*lenp) {
*lenp = 0;
return 0;
}
+
if (write)
return -EINVAL;
else {
len = svc_print_xprts(tmpbuf, sizeof(tmpbuf));
- if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, buffer, len))
- return -EFAULT;
-
- if (__copy_to_user(buffer, tmpbuf, len))
- return -EFAULT;
+ ret = simple_read_from_buffer(buffer, *lenp, ppos,
+ tmpbuf, len);
+ if (ret >= 0) {
+ *lenp = ret;
+ ret = 0;
+ }
+ return ret;
}
- *lenp -= len;
- *ppos += len;
+
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib: add generic helper to print sizes rounded to the correct SI range
- Next by Date: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] intelfb: support 945GME (as used in ASUS Eee 901)
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] x86: amd k6-2 mtrr not detected fix
- Next by thread: [REGRESSION] High, likely incorrect process cpu usage counters with kvm and 2.6.2[67]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|