Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:45:35 +0200
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 08:09:48AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Under that logic we shouldn't even have CPU configurables, since you want it
to "just work" whatever crap you're running on. That is EXACTLY what
CONFIG_X86_GENERIC means
I dunno.. Event he help-text doesn't actually agree with that:
The help text matches in how I wrote this option originally.
The original use case was the 128 byte P4 cache lines.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC
- References:
- Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC
- From: David Sanders
- Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC
- From: David Sanders
- Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC
- From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/3] smp: reduce stack requirements for smp_call_function_mask
- Next by Date: Re: Re: [PATCH] cgroup(fix critical bug): new handling for tasks file
- Previous by thread: Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC
- Next by thread: Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
