Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]
- From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:46:10 -0700
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
can you post boot log with working kernel + "debug"?
This is the map of the early reservations (will send the dmesg + debug later):
[ 0.000000] (6 early reservations) ==> bootmem [0000000000 - 00bbf90000]
[ 0.000000] #0 [0000000000 - 0000001000] BIOS data page ==>
[0000000000 - 0000001000]
[ 0.000000] #1 [0000006000 - 0000008000] TRAMPOLINE ==>
[0000006000 - 0000008000]
[ 0.000000] #2 [0000200000 - 0000d012b8] TEXT DATA BSS ==>
[0000200000 - 0000d012b8]
[ 0.000000] #3 [00037dc000 - 00040fe2d9] RAMDISK ==>
[00037dc000 - 00040fe2d9]
[ 0.000000] #4 [000009c800 - 0000100000] BIOS reserved ==>
[000009c800 - 0000100000]
[ 0.000000] #5 [0000008000 - 000000b000] PGTABLE ==>
[0000008000 - 000000b000]
As a side note: I've bigger older (2.6.26) kernels that boots fine,
and smaller 2.6.27 kernels that do not work, e.g. this one:
that could explain sth. big kernel use more, and lilo put ramdisk
high from 0x37dc000
Overlapping early reservations b71000-effb43 RAMDISK to 200000-c84ecf
TEXT DATA BSS
need to figure out, lilo put ramdisk so low...
need to know e820 table layout...
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009c800 (usable)
BIOS-e820: 000000000009c800 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000000e4000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 00000000bbf90000 (usable)
BIOS-e820: 00000000bbf90000 - 00000000bbf9e000 (ACPI data)
BIOS-e820: 00000000bbf9e000 - 00000000bbfe0000 (ACPI NVS)
BIOS-e820: 00000000bbfe0000 - 00000000bc000000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000ffb00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
last_pfn = 0xbbf90 max_arch_pfn = 0x3ffffffff
dmesg is attached, but I haven't rebooted yet.
so some config works, others not?
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]
- From: Luca Tettamanti
- Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]
- References:
- Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]
- From: Luca Tettamanti
- Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]
- From: Luca Tettamanti
- Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]
- From: Yinghai Lu
- Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]
- From: Luca Tettamanti
- Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]
- From: Yinghai Lu
- Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]
- From: Luca Tettamanti
- Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]
- From: Yinghai Lu
- Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]
- From: Luca Tettamanti
- Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 2.6.27-rc5] Fix itimer/many thread hang.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: revise VPD access interface
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]
- Next by thread: Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|