Re: [PATCH 1/2] Traffic control cgroups subsystem
- From: "Paul Menage" <menage@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:53:16 -0700
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
That's argueable I guess. Likely or not, it doesn't make sense to
add such restrictions if not required, especially not when it is
trivial to just look at the cgroup of the task directly.
Isn't a very large fraction of outgoing network traffic driven from
net_tx_action(), which doesn't execute in the context of the sending
process? Or am I missing something?
You claimed "In the most common case, the packet is not queued before
it hits the qdisc so this takes away a lot of complexity and is very
fast but should still be sufficient.". But is that really true on a
system where the network is busy? (Which is after all exactly the case
where you care about accurate traffic accounting/policing)
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 1/2] Traffic control cgroups subsystem
- From: Ranjit Manomohan
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Traffic control cgroups subsystem
- From: Thomas Graf
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Traffic control cgroups subsystem
- From: Ranjit Manomohan
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Traffic control cgroups subsystem
- From: Paul Menage
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Traffic control cgroups subsystem
- From: Thomas Graf
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Traffic control cgroups subsystem
- From: Paul Menage
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Traffic control cgroups subsystem
- From: Thomas Graf
- [PATCH 1/2] Traffic control cgroups subsystem
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Traffic control cgroups subsystem
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Traffic control cgroups subsystem
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Traffic control cgroups subsystem
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Traffic control cgroups subsystem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|