Re: [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/qe: new call to revert a gpio to a dedicated function
- From: Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:00:03 -0500
On Sep 24, 2008, at 6:42 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:07:00PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 23, 2008, at 7:03 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
qe_gpio_set_dedicated() is a platform specific function, which is used
to revert a pin to a dedicated function. Caller should have already
obtained the gpio via gpio_request().
This is needed to support Freescale USB Host Controller.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/qe.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/gpio.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++
+++++++++
2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
what do you mean by dedicated function.. be a bit clearer in the commit
log.
This term is from the QE spec, I didn't invent anything. ;-)
"Each pin in the I/O ports can be configured as a general-purpose
I/O signal or as a dedicated peripheral interface signal. ...many
dedicated peripheral functions are multiplexed onto the ports."
I understand but I think 'dedicated' could be interpreted in another way (like the GPIO pin is dedicated, not that the pin is used for a dedicated SoC block).
If it the commit message had said 'to a dedicated on chip peripheral' it would be clearer.
Also, does this depend on gpio_to_chip() patch?
Yeah, the point of exported gpio_to_chip is to let us write
this function.
I meant can I take this patch w/o the gpio_to_chip() patch? (not clear from your response)
- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/qe: new call to revert a gpio to a dedicated function
- From: Anton Vorontsov
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/qe: new call to revert a gpio to a dedicated function
- References:
- [PATCH 0/4] FHCI USB Host support patches
- From: Anton Vorontsov
- [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/qe: new call to revert a gpio to a dedicated function
- From: Anton Vorontsov
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/qe: new call to revert a gpio to a dedicated function
- From: Kumar Gala
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/qe: new call to revert a gpio to a dedicated function
- From: Anton Vorontsov
- [PATCH 0/4] FHCI USB Host support patches
- Prev by Date: KDGKBENT and unicode
- Next by Date: Re: dm-ioband + bio-cgroup benchmarks
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/qe: new call to revert a gpio to a dedicated function
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/qe: new call to revert a gpio to a dedicated function
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|