Re: [PATCH] x86_64: be less annoying on boot
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:51:21 +0200
(Cc: added. Mail-Followup-To is evil.)
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
--
* Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ingo Molnar (mingo@xxxxxxx) said:
(Alternatively, just remove them, of course...)
LOL :) Applied the commit below to tip/x86/debug, thanks Bill!
Does the 'kernel alive' right before it serve any purpose either?
that has some marginal use: it shows that we are past the really basic
system setup code, we decompressed the kernel and entered protected mode
with boot paging enabled.
we had bugs in the past where we'd hang/crash after GRUB starts us and
before we reach this printk.
OTOH ... forcing it upon all users is strong. Feel free to send another
patch that removes it.
Ingo
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] x86_64: be less annoying on boot
- From: Bill Nottingham
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64: be less annoying on boot
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64: be less annoying on boot
- From: Bill Nottingham
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64: be less annoying on boot
- From: Ingo Molnar
- [PATCH] x86_64: be less annoying on boot
- Prev by Date: Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick periodic()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 7/7] x86: print out irq nr for msi/ht -v2
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: be less annoying on boot
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: be less annoying on boot
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
