Re: wrong usage of MAX_DMA_ADDRESS in bootmem.h
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:56:26 -0500
Nicolas Pitre wrote:
I have implemented highmem for ARM. To catch wrong usage of __pa() and
One issue is that bootmem.h uses __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS). However
MAX_DMA_ADDRESS on ARM is defined as 0xffffffff because there is usually
no restriction on the maximum DMA-able address.
RMK suggested that those places should be using ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD
instead -- here's an excert of our conversation on this topic:
ok so do
#define MAX_DMA_ADDRESS ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD
I suspect all those places which are doing __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS) really
want to be using ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD - that's something to raise on LKML
if it's causing problems.
MAX_DMA_ADDRESS is the highest address used for ZONE_DMA / GFP_DMA
Does ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD have any meaning on ARM? If you use old ISA stuff then
you need CONFIG_ZONE_DMA and therefore also MAX_DMA_ADDRESS.
If not then there is no need to define CONFIG_ZONE_DMA and MAX_DMA_ADDRESS
looses its usual meaning.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: wrong usage of MAX_DMA_ADDRESS in bootmem.h
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux
- Re: wrong usage of MAX_DMA_ADDRESS in bootmem.h
- References:
- wrong usage of MAX_DMA_ADDRESS in bootmem.h
- From: Nicolas Pitre
- wrong usage of MAX_DMA_ADDRESS in bootmem.h
- Prev by Date: APIC frequency too slow on HP dv5z
- Next by Date: Re: Typo bug [Re: Linux 2.6.27-rc8]
- Previous by thread: wrong usage of MAX_DMA_ADDRESS in bootmem.h
- Next by thread: Re: wrong usage of MAX_DMA_ADDRESS in bootmem.h
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|