Re: [PATCH] mm: unify shmem and tiny-shmem
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:38:25 +1000
On Thursday 02 October 2008 04:39, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Matt Mackall wrote:
(This applies on top of Nick's second tiny-shmem patch, which hasn't
made it to mainline yet(!).
Gosh, thanks for mentioning that, you're right, it hasn't. I saw
git pull updating mm/tiny-shmem.c a few days ago, and took it for
granted that that was the #ifndef CONFIG_MMU fixed version; but it
was the earlier one without that fix, despite us all knowing that
fix was needed. I'd have pushed it myself for -rc8 if I'd realized
it was still missing: Nick, please push it to Linus a.s.a.p. (with
Acks from Matt and David and me) - or ask me to do so (I'm not sure
when Andrew is back up and running).
Linus must have missed it I guess, because I think I did address it to
him.
If you or Matt or Andrew push it up, it might get taken seriously ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] mm: unify shmem and tiny-shmem
- From: Matt Mackall
- Re: [PATCH] mm: unify shmem and tiny-shmem
- From: Hugh Dickins
- [PATCH] mm: unify shmem and tiny-shmem
- Prev by Date: Re: Typo bug [Re: Linux 2.6.27-rc8]
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] setup_per_zone_pages_min(): take zone->lock instead of zone->lru_lock
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] mm: unify shmem and tiny-shmem
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] mm: unify shmem and tiny-shmem
- Index(es):
Loading