Re: Honoring SO_RCVLOWAT in proto_ops.poll methods
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: lkml@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 00:17:18 -0500
Looks like the RCVLOWAT patch breaks the tcp poll logic in the normal
case.
Sorry, the condition was reversed, try this one instead:
FWIW, since this passed my own testing, I pushed this into
net-next-2.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Honoring SO_RCVLOWAT in proto_ops.poll methods
- From: David Miller
- Re: Honoring SO_RCVLOWAT in proto_ops.poll methods
- From: lkml
- Re: Honoring SO_RCVLOWAT in proto_ops.poll methods
- From: David Miller
- Re: Honoring SO_RCVLOWAT in proto_ops.poll methods
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] atmel-mci: Initialize BLKR before sending data transfer command
- Next by Date: [patch 2.6.27-rc8-git] add drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c
- Previous by thread: Re: Honoring SO_RCVLOWAT in proto_ops.poll methods
- Next by thread: Re: Honoring SO_RCVLOWAT in proto_ops.poll methods
- Index(es):