Re: sched domains oddness.
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:17:21 -0400
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:09:29AM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
looks like someone is triggering rebuild_sched_domains(), is something
poking cpusetfs files or flipping between sched_mc settings?
I remember someone mentioning that some distro's started setting
sched_mc_power_savings to '1' by default during boot. On a dual-core
laptop, this will not give any advantage.
I have to fix the code to not export this tunable, when we have only
socket in the system.
Dave, Is your distro also setting this tunable blindly during boot :(
(13:15:25:davej@vaio:~)$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_mc_power_savings
0
So no, unless something set it to 1, and then back to 0.
A grep of etc shows up nothing in initscripts. Does hal or something
play with this?
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sched domains oddness.
- From: Dave Jones
- Re: sched domains oddness.
- References:
- sched domains oddness.
- From: Dave Jones
- Re: sched domains oddness.
- From: Peter Zijlstra
- Re: sched domains oddness.
- From: Suresh Siddha
- sched domains oddness.
- Prev by Date: Re: driver core: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name()
- Next by Date: Re: ath5k gets lost with eeepc-laptop removal
- Previous by thread: Re: sched domains oddness.
- Next by thread: Re: sched domains oddness.
- Index(es):