ext2/3 vs. kingston 32G SD card
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 12:02:25 +0100
Hi!
I got 32GB kingston SD card, and am using it with ext2 for storing git
trees etc.
Unfortunately, every time I run fsck, I get rather nasty corruption.
I switched it to ext3 now, but I believe I have seen corruption even
on volume marked clean, which should be impossible from user error.
If I suspect wrong block device, what are useful tests to run there?
Or maybe I should do some test on filesystem level? (So far I try
compiling kernels, but that does not seem to provoke the corruption.)
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ext2/3 vs. kingston 32G SD card
- From: Jörn Engel
- Re: ext2/3 vs. kingston 32G SD card
- From: Bart Van Assche
- Re: ext2/3 vs. kingston 32G SD card
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] ftrace: sysctl typo
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] kernel/cpu.c: Section mismatch warning fix.
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] ftrace: sysctl typo
- Next by thread: Re: ext2/3 vs. kingston 32G SD card
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|