Re: ext2/3 vs. kingston 32G SD card
- From: Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 12:47:33 +0100
On Tue, 4 November 2008 12:02:25 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
I got 32GB kingston SD card, and am using it with ext2 for storing git
trees etc.
Unfortunately, every time I run fsck, I get rather nasty corruption.
I switched it to ext3 now, but I believe I have seen corruption even
on volume marked clean, which should be impossible from user error.
If I suspect wrong block device, what are useful tests to run there?
Not likely in your case, but a number of counterfeited devices are on
the market. They contain a much smaller chip inside than is advertised
plus some logic to return 0x00 when reading from non-existent memory.
To test for this, simply write 0xff to the complete device and read it
back. 'hd' is useful, as it compressed the output into four lines for a
good device and a bit more when you bought crap.
Jörn
--
Man darf nicht das, was uns unwahrscheinlich und unnatürlich erscheint,
mit dem verwechseln, was absolut unmöglich ist.
-- Carl Friedrich Gauß
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ext2/3 vs. kingston 32G SD card
- From: Pavel Machek
- Re: ext2/3 vs. kingston 32G SD card
- References:
- ext2/3 vs. kingston 32G SD card
- From: Pavel Machek
- ext2/3 vs. kingston 32G SD card
- Prev by Date: Re: Add option to passively listen for PCIE hotplug events
- Next by Date: Re: sata error on ICH8M (Dell Vostro 1710 laptop)
- Previous by thread: Re: ext2/3 vs. kingston 32G SD card
- Next by thread: Re: ext2/3 vs. kingston 32G SD card
- Index(es):