Re: [RFC PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq
- From: "Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 00:03:40 -0800
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
General impression: very nice patch!
A lot of the structural problems have been addressed: the descriptor
lookup is now hashed, the dynarray stuff got cleaned up / eliminated,
the irq_desc->chip_data binding is very nice as well.
(And the patch needs to be split up like it was in the past, once all
review feedback has been seen and addressed.)
+config HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
+ bool
+ default y
i think it should be made user-configurable - at least initially. It
should not cause extra complications, right?
io_apic.c will get more complicated.
+ if (irq < NR_IRQS_LEGACY) {
please s/NR_IRQS_LEGACY/NR_IRQS_X86_LEGACY - this is never used
outside of x86 code.
will use that in kernel/irq/handle.c too, because dyn_array is dumped.
+ cfg_new = desc_new->chip_data;
the chip_data binding is a nice touch.
- irq_want = build_irq_for_pci_dev(dev) + 0x100;
+ irq_want = build_irq_for_pci_dev(dev) + 0xfff;
please replace magic constant with a properly named constant.
- if (WARN_ON(nr > NR_IRQS))
- nr = NR_IRQS;
this will have to stay for the !SPARSE_IRQ case.
Yes
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ static unsigned long __meminitdata table
static unsigned long __meminitdata table_top;
static int __initdata after_init_bootmem;
+int after_bootmem;
static __init void *alloc_low_page(unsigned long *phys)
{
@@ -987,6 +988,8 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
set_highmem_pages_init();
+ after_bootmem = 1;
this hack can go away once we have a proper percpu_alloc() that can be
used early enough.
where is that fancy patch?
current percpu_alloc(), will keep big pointer in array..., instead of
put that pointer in percpu_area
64bit has that after_bootmem already.
+#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
i'd suggest s/HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ/SPARSE_IRQ - as the HAVE_* flags are for
architecture code to signal the presence of a facility.
OK
+#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
if (irq >= nr_irqs)
return;
+#endif
we should hide as many ugly #ifdefs as possible, and define nr_irqs to
NR_IRQS in the !SPARSE_IRQ case.
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/htirq.c
@@ -82,6 +82,18 @@ void unmask_ht_irq(unsigned int irq)
write_ht_irq_msg(irq, &msg);
}
+static unsigned int build_irq_for_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+ unsigned int irq;
+
+ irq = dev->bus->number;
+ irq <<= 8;
+ irq |= dev->devfn;
+ irq <<= 12;
+
+ return irq;
magic constants should be named.
should add more comment here.
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
+ irq = create_irq_nr(irq_want + idx);
+#else
irq = create_irq();
+#endif
please eliminate this #ifdef by adding one new API:
create_irq_nr(idx), which just maps to the create_irq() API in the
!SPARSE_IRQ case.
static struct irq_2_iommu *irq_2_iommu(unsigned int irq)
{
- return (irq < nr_irqs) ? irq_2_iommuX + irq : NULL;
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+
+ desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
+
+ BUG_ON(!desc);
+
+ return desc->irq_2_iommu;
the BUG_ON() is not too friendly, please do something like this
instead:
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!desc))
return NULL;
+#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
/* protect irq_2_iommu_alloc later */
if (irq >= nr_irqs)
return -1;
+#endif
this #ifdef can be eliminated too and turned into straight code via
the #define nr_irqs NR_IRQS trick in the !SPARSE_IRQ case.
- for_each_irq_desc(i, desc)
+ for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) {
desc->affinity = cpumask_of_cpu(0);
+ } end_for_each_irq_desc();
Sidenote: later on, once the patch is upstream, we should do a global
rename:
s/for_each_irq_desc/do_each_irq_desc
s/end_for_each_irq_desc/while_each_irq_desc
as it's much harder to miss the "while" in a "do ..." loop, than it is
to miss the "end" in a "for" loop.
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
+static struct irq_desc irq_desc_init = {
+ .irq = -1U,
+ .status = IRQ_DISABLED,
+ .chip = &no_irq_chip,
+ .handle_irq = handle_bad_irq,
+ .depth = 1,
+ .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(irq_desc_init.lock),
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ .affinity = CPU_MASK_ALL
+#endif
+};
please align structure fields vertically.
+static struct irq_desc irq_desc_legacy[NR_IRQS_LEGACY] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp = {
+ [0 ... NR_IRQS_LEGACY-1] = {
+ .irq = -1U,
+ .status = IRQ_DISABLED,
+ .chip = &no_irq_chip,
+ .handle_irq = handle_bad_irq,
+ .depth = 1,
+ .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(irq_desc_init.lock),
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ .affinity = CPU_MASK_ALL
+#endif
+ }
+};
same here.
@@ -199,7 +200,6 @@ extern void reinit_intr_remapped_IO_APIC
#endif
extern int probe_nr_irqs(void);
-
#else /* !CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC */
#define io_apic_assign_pci_irqs 0
static const int timer_through_8259 = 0;
that's a spurious removal of a newline.
.....
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [RFC PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq
- References:
- [RFC PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq
- From: Yinghai Lu
- Re: [RFC PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq
- From: Ingo Molnar
- [RFC PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|