Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: the page of MIGRATE_RESERVE don't insert into pcp
- From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:13:54 +0900 (JST)
Oh, do you mean splitting the list instead of searching? This is how it was
originally implement and shot down on the grounds it increased the size of
a per-cpu structure.
The situation may be better with the cpu_alloc stuff. The big pcp array in
struct zone for all possible processors will be gone and thus the memory
requirements will be less.
Yup, there are very nicer patch!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: the page of MIGRATE_RESERVE don't insert into pcp
- From: Mel Gorman
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: the page of MIGRATE_RESERVE don't insert into pcp
- From: Christoph Lameter
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: the page of MIGRATE_RESERVE don't insert into pcp
- Prev by Date: Re: allocation failure in b43/ssb
- Next by Date: [git pull] drm fixes for 2.6.27-rc5
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: the page of MIGRATE_RESERVE don't insert into pcp
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: the page of MIGRATE_RESERVE don't insert into pcp
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
