Re: [PATCH v3] Fix dma_mapping_error for 32bit x86
- From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:34:51 +0100
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 01:46:27PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
Devices like b44 ethernet can't dma from addresses above 1GB. The driver
handles this cases by falling back to GFP_DMA allocation. But for detecting
the problem it needs to get an indication from dma_mapping_error.
The bug is triggered by using a VMSPLIT option of 2G/2G.
Looks like your system uses swiotlb as the dma_ops backend. Its the only
implementation providing the ops->mapping_error callback and does not
use bad_dma_address as the error value.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
diff -ru orig/linux-2.6.27.4/include/asm-x86/dma-mapping.h linux-2.6.27.4/include/asm-x86/dma-mapping.h
--- orig/linux-2.6.27.4/include/asm-x86/dma-mapping.h 2008-10-26 00:05:07.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.27.4/include/asm-x86/dma-mapping.h 2008-10-26 11:06:14.000000000 +0100
@@ -74,15 +74,13 @@
/* Make sure we keep the same behaviour */
static inline int dma_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
- return 0;
-#else
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
struct dma_mapping_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
if (ops->mapping_error)
return ops->mapping_error(dev, dma_addr);
- return (dma_addr == bad_dma_address);
#endif
+ return (dma_addr == bad_dma_address);
}
#define dma_alloc_noncoherent(d, s, h, f) dma_alloc_coherent(d, s, h, f)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3] Fix dma_mapping_error for 32bit x86
- From: FUJITA Tomonori
- Re: [PATCH v3] Fix dma_mapping_error for 32bit x86
- Prev by Date: Re: BUG? "Call fasync() functions without the BKL" is racy
- Next by Date: [PATCH 0/2] Series short description
- Previous by thread: Re: BUG? "Call fasync() functions without the BKL" is racy
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v3] Fix dma_mapping_error for 32bit x86
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|