Re: Regression in 2.6.28-rc and 2.6.27-stable - hibernate related
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 01:24:29 +0100
(CCing to linux-acpi at Rui's request)
On Thursday, 27 of November 2008, Fabio Comolli wrote:
Hi--
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Actually, yes, Fabio, you can try to revert all of the "ACPI: EC:" commits
applied after 2.6.27.4 and retest.
Will do tonight. I see that there are some other "ACPI: EC:" commits
in 2.6.27.6 and 2.6.27.7.
I'l just compile the ec.c file from 2.6.27.4 in 2.6.27.7 and test if
the three commits introduced in 2.6.27.5 wouldn't revert cleanly,
By the way, my HD passed a "smartctl -t long" test without any problems.
Reproduced with 2.6.27.7 with ec.c taken from 2.6.27.4 - after three
minutes of freeze the laptop came back to normal as nothing had
happened.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Prev by Date: Re: Regression from 2.6.26: Hibernation (possibly suspend) broken on Toshiba R500 (bisected)
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 0/3] [Announcement] Performance Counters for Linux
- Previous by thread: [PATCH -regression fix] ACPI: Fix ACPI battery regression introduced by commit 558073
- Next by thread: Re: Regression in 2.6.28-rc and 2.6.27-stable - hibernate related
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|