Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
- From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:42:49 +0100
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 11:38 -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
Below is the result of full bisect
futex: rely on get_user_pages() for shared futexes
However does a futex change make ext3 crap its pants?
Is there anything more to it than start the machine, and reboot?
Just system startup and reboot is enough to reproduce the problem. And 100%
reproducible. So, does seem to be any timing involved either.
That's very odd indeed, non of my test systems nor Ingo's ever triggered
this, and that patch has been in -tip for a rather long time.
CommitDate: Tue Sep 30 12:35:20 2008 +0200
That's 3.5 months of test time.. most curious. What kind of userland do
you have that triggers this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
- From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh
- Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
- References:
- kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
- From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh
- Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
- From: Theodore Tso
- Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
- From: Arjan van de Ven
- Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
- From: Theodore Tso
- Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
- From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh
- Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
- From: Peter Zijlstra
- Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
- From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh
- kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
- Prev by Date: Re: problems showing up as XFS problems on kernels after 2.6.28-git2
- Next by Date: Re: problems showing up as XFS problems on kernels after 2.6.28-git2
- Previous by thread: Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
- Next by thread: Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
