Re: [patch 4/5] x86, ftrace, hw-branch-tracer: reset trace on close
- From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:01:30 -0500
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 12:01 +0100, Markus Metzger wrote:
Reset the ftrace buffer on close. Since we use cyclic buffers to store
the trace, the trace is not contiguous, anyway. This behaviour should
be more natural.
So you want multiple reads of /debug/tracing/trace to return different
output? Kind of like the trace_pipe? But trace_pipe is a real consumer.
Signed-off-by: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Index: ftrace/kernel/trace/trace_hw_branches.c
===================================================================
--- ftrace.orig/kernel/trace/trace_hw_branches.c 2009-01-14 15:26:11.000000000 +0100
+++ ftrace/kernel/trace/trace_hw_branches.c 2009-01-14 15:26:16.000000000 +0100
@@ -272,6 +272,11 @@
mutex_unlock(&bts_tracer_mutex);
}
+static void trace_bts_close(struct trace_iterator *iter)
+{
+ tracing_reset_online_cpus(iter->tr);
+}
+
void trace_hw_branch_oops(void)
{
mutex_lock(&bts_tracer_mutex);
@@ -290,7 +295,8 @@
BTW, can you run your diff with the -p option. This will help in knowing
which function the change is in. There's some hunks where it is
ambiguous. If you use quilt, you can add:
QUILT_DIFF_OPTS='-p'
to you .quiltrc file.
-- Steve
.print_line = bts_trace_print_line,
.start = bts_trace_start,
.stop = bts_trace_stop,
- .open = trace_bts_prepare
+ .open = trace_bts_prepare,
+ .close = trace_bts_close
};
__init static int init_bts_trace(void)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel GmbH
Dornacher Strasse 1
85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen Germany
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Douglas Lusk, Peter Gleissner, Hannes Schwaderer
Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 Ust.-IdNr.
VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
Citibank Frankfurt (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [patch 4/5] x86, ftrace, hw-branch-tracer: reset trace on close
- From: Metzger, Markus T
- RE: [patch 4/5] x86, ftrace, hw-branch-tracer: reset trace on close
- References:
- [patch 4/5] x86, ftrace, hw-branch-tracer: reset trace on close
- From: Markus Metzger
- [patch 4/5] x86, ftrace, hw-branch-tracer: reset trace on close
- Prev by Date: Grant Award
- Next by Date: RE: [patch 3/5] x86, ftrace, hw-branch-tracer: dump on oops
- Previous by thread: [patch 4/5] x86, ftrace, hw-branch-tracer: reset trace on close
- Next by thread: RE: [patch 4/5] x86, ftrace, hw-branch-tracer: reset trace on close
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading